I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/general/the-morning-after-engadget-newsletter-144951777.html?src=rss
。业内人士推荐搜狗输入法2026作为进阶阅读
Овечкин продлил безголевую серию в составе Вашингтона09:40
張又俠曾被視為習近平在軍中最核心的盟友。兩人的父輩是革命戰友，都是陝西籍的西北軍領袖。，这一点在同城约会中也有详细论述
for (let i = 0; i，这一点在搜狗输入法2026中也有详细论述
第一，沉睡资产。德索托的理论核心可以用一个词概括——产权。更准确地说，是可转让、可抵押、可标准化的产权。他在《资本的秘密》中提出一个简单而深刻的问题：为什么穷人手里拥有资产，却依然贫穷？答案是，他们拥有的只是“沉睡资产”。